Gastro Diplomacy demanding economic and ecological balance.

Sept 2025 : Soon after the Bangladeshi Interim Government have given the green signal of exporting Hilsa Fish to India on the occasion of the forth coming Durga Puja, a Bangladesh Supreme Court lawyer today filed a writ petition with the High Court challenging the legality of the interim government’s decision to permit exporting tons of hilsa fish to India.

Advocate Md. Mahmudul Hasan submitted the petition as a public interest litigation also seeking its order on the government to cancel the decision and to issue a ban on the exports of hilsa fish captured from Padma and Meghna Rivers to abroad. In the petition, he said that according to the Bangladesh Export Policy 2021-24, hilsa fish is not a freely exportable product, and moreover is subject to several paraphernalia before the export procedure commences.

In the present geo political matrix of South Asian diplomacy, shared resources often emerge as a focal point of cooperation or contention. One such resource, the hilsa fish (Ilish), holds a distinctive place not just in the waters of the Bay of Bengal but in the hearts of millions of people, both in Bangladesh and in the Indian state of West Bengal. The recent decision by the Bangladeshi government to resume hilsa exports to India ahead of Durga Puja has reignited a conversation that transcends mere trade—it speaks to the potential of gastro diplomacy to further solidify ties between neighbouring nations.

Bangladesh and India share one of the longest land borders in the world, stretching over 4,096 kilometres. Beyond geographical proximity, the two nations have deep historical, cultural, and economic ties. India remains one of Bangladesh’s key development partners, contributing to various sectors, including infrastructure, trade, and commerce. Over the decades, Bangladesh has increasingly relied on Indian investments, expertise, and access to markets, fostering a relationship that is pivotal for the region’s stability and cooperation.

In recent years, the concept of “hilsa diplomacy” has gained prominence, signifying the symbolic importance of the fish in bilateral relations. Once a staple food for the middle and lower classes in both Bangladesh and West Bengal, hilsa has now become an increasingly unaffordable luxury. Its rising price, fuelled by a combination of ecological factors and demand fluctuations, has put the fish at the centre of both trade negotiations and dining table discussions.

Despite Bangladesh’s position as one of the world’s largest producers of hilsa, with production nearly doubling in the last decade, the economic benefits of this surge have not trickled down to the average consumer. Paradoxically, as hilsa production increased, its price also skyrocketed, making it inaccessible to much of the population. In Dhaka, prices for hilsa in local markets range from Tk 800 to Tk 1,600 (Rs. 550 to Rs. 1100 in Indian Currency) per kilogram, depending on size, with traders reporting even higher prices in some areas. This escalation has made hilsa a luxury item, a far cry from its status as a staple food in Bangladeshi homes.

While Industry Experts have attributed the slowing growth in hilsa production as a critical factor contributing to this price surge. Environmental degradation, river pollution, encroachment on riverbanks, and unplanned infrastructure development have all played a role in disrupting hilsa’s breeding grounds. The construction of dams and other river-blocking structures, combined with reduced river water flow, has made it increasingly difficult for the fish to migrate upstream to lay eggs, threatening its population. Moreover, the lack of coordination between Bangladesh and India regarding hilsa management during its breeding season exacerbates the issue.

The decision to export hilsa to India in anticipation of Durga Puja is not without its controversies. After assuming office, the interim government initially halted hilsa exports to India, citing high domestic prices and the fact that many Bangladeshi citizens could no longer afford the fish. However, this stance was reversed, and on September 21, 2024, the Ministry of Commerce approved the export of 3,000 tons of hilsa to India.

While this decision may benefit India’s Bengali population, who regard hilsa as an integral part of their culinary heritage, it has raised concerns within Bangladesh. Every year, ahead of Durga Puja, the price of hilsa in the local market spikes, placing an even heavier burden on the middle and lower classes. For many, the export of this prized fish has become a symbol of how diplomacy can sometimes serve the interests of a few at the expense of the many.

Despite these concerns, there are strategic advantages to using hilsa as a diplomatic tool. The shared love of the fish between the Bengali populations on either side of the border offers a unique cultural bridge. Hilsa diplomacy reflects a deeper cultural connection, symbolising how food can unite people across borders. However, this approach must be carefully managed to ensure that the economic and ecological balance is maintained and that the benefits of trade do not disproportionately impact domestic consumers.

The hilsa trade between Bangladesh and India highlights a broader issue in the realm of resource diplomacy. For hilsa diplomacy to be sustainable, both countries need to engage in comprehensive, long-term planning. This includes addressing environmental concerns, investing in river management, and ensuring that infrastructure development does not come at the expense of vital ecosystems.

Furthermore, joint efforts between Bangladesh and India to protect hilsa during its breeding season could significantly boost the fish population, benefiting both nations. By working together to regulate fishing practices and manage river habitats, the two countries can ensure that hilsa remains not only a symbol of cultural unity but also an affordable source of nutrition for their populations. Hilsa diplomacy presents an opportunity for Bangladesh and India to collaborate on sustainable development, showing that economic cooperation and environmental conservation can go hand in hand.

Team Maverick