“Iran’s Unprecedented Aerial Assault Alters Dynamics in Israel Conflict”
In a dramatic turn of events, Iran launched an unprecedented aerial assault targeting Israel, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between the two nations. President Ebrahim Raeisi hailed the operation carried out by the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC) as a pivotal moment, warning Israel of dire consequences should it retaliate recklessly.
The attack, which occurred overnight, involved the deployment of over 300 drones and missiles, making it Iran’s first direct strike on Israel. The assault was reportedly in response to an Israeli strike on Iran’s consulate in Syria earlier in April, further exacerbating the longstanding shadow war between the two adversaries.
President Biden confirmed that US military forces in the region assisted Israel in intercepting the Iranian drones and missiles, underscoring the international dimensions of the conflict. Britain also played a role in what it described as an “international coordinated effort” to thwart the Iranian attack. Additionally, Jordan reported taking measures to address objects that traversed its airspace during the assault.
Following the attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged resolve, but the specific nature of Israel’s response remains uncertain. Israeli defense and foreign ministers had previously cautioned that any Iranian aggression would be met with retaliatory strikes inside Iran.
Iran, for its part, issued stern warnings against further escalation. President Raeisi emphasized that any reckless behavior from Israel or its allies would be met with a decisively stronger response. Iranian military chief Major-General Mohammad Bagheri echoed this sentiment, cautioning that a much larger retaliation awaited Israel should it provoke Iran further.
Furthermore, Iran’s armed forces chief of staff conveyed a clear message to the US, indicating that American support for Israeli retaliation would result in the targeting of US regional bases. This assertion underscores Iran’s determination to defend its interests against external interference.
IRGC Chief Major General Hossain Salami reiterated Iran’s stance, declaring that the equation against Israel had been altered, with Iran prepared to directly confront any aggression. He warned that future attacks on Iranian interests or assets would be met with swift retaliation from within Iran itself.
Despite Israel’s claims of intercepting the majority of incoming projectiles, some ballistic missiles reportedly breached its defenses, causing damage to a southern airbase. Iranian officials emphasized that their operation specifically targeted military installations, avoiding civilian and economic targets.
Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian highlighted the precision of Iran’s response, framing it as a legitimate act of self-defense against Israeli aggression. He criticized the Security Council’s inaction, suggesting that it emboldened Israel to flout international laws.
Reports indicate that the main targets of the Iranian assault were military installations in the occupied Golan Heights and the Negev desert. Concurrently, Hezbollah in Lebanon and Houthi forces in Yemen reportedly launched attacks on the Golan Heights, demonstrating a coordinated effort against Israeli targets.
In summary, Iran’s aerial attack has fundamentally shifted the dynamics of the Israel-Iran conflict, raising concerns about further escalation and the potential for broader regional repercussions. As both sides brace for potential retaliation, the situation remains highly volatile, with the specter of a wider conflict looming large.
Defence Minister Of Singapore Calls On The President
The Defence Minister of Singapore, Dr Ng Eng Hen called on the President of Indi…